103
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 05 - n 01 - ano 2025
BREAST RECONSTRUCTION AFTER MASTECTOMY: A SURGERY FOR
SELF-ESTEEM AND REBIRTH
João Pedro do Valle Varela1
Jennifer Paes de Moura2
Rodney Freire Andrade3
Jacqueline Monfradini da Silva4
Shayra Tofano Monteiro5
Felipe Zanotti Duccini6
Tullio Dalgobbo Samorini7
Vitor Hugo Mendes da Cunha8
Mariana Siqueira Dyna9
Milena Salvador10
Letícia Rodrigues de Almeida11
Davi Pinheiro de Mello Canabarro12
Emanuel Moura de Souza Santos13
Marcos Louro de Hollanda14
1 São Carlos University Center
2 São Carlos University Center
3 São Carlos University Center
4 Federal University of Espírito Santo - UFES
5 School of Sciences of Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Vitória - EMESCAM
6 School of Sciences of Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Vitória - EMESCAM
7 School of Sciences of Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Vitória - EMESCAM
8 Souza Marques Colleges
9 Vila Velha University - UVV
10 Vila Velha University - UVV
11 Federal University of Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ
12 Multivix Vitória University Center
13 Multivix Vitória University Center
14 Federal University of Rio de Janeiro - UFRJ (Plastic Surgeon, Master and PhD student in
Plastic Surgery)
104
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 05 - n 01 - ano 2025
Adeânio Almeida Lima15
Abstract: Mastectomy, although vital in the treatment of breast cancer, can have a signicant impact
on patients’ self-esteem and quality of life. Breast reconstruction plays a central role in physical and
emotional recovery and is widely recognized as a surgery that goes beyond aesthetics, representing
a symbol of rebirth and recovery of female identity. The aim of this study is to explore the advances
and benets of post-mastectomy breast reconstruction, addressing its psychological implications,
available techniques and the challenges faced by patients in the rehabilitation process. This literature
review analyzes advances in breast reconstruction after mastectomy, with a focus on patient-centered
outcomes, psychological implications, technological innovations and challenges in resource-limited
settings. The review covers reconstruction techniques such as the use of DIEP aps and implants,
as well as exploring barriers to access and the future prospects of the eld. Breast reconstruction
techniques include the use of prostheses, autologous aps and hybrid approaches, which are chosen
according to the patient’s clinical conditions and preferences. Studies show that reconstruction has
a positive impact on mental health, reducing rates of depression and anxiety. However, challenges
such as unequal access to the procedure and fears about complications are still barriers faced. In
addition, advances in biomaterials and microsurgery have improved aesthetic and functional results,
increasing patient satisfaction. Therefore, breast reconstruction is more than a surgical intervention;
it is a process of physical and emotional transformation that contributes to giving new meaning to
the cancer experience. Investing in policies that increase access to this surgery and in technological
advances that optimize the results is essential to guarantee complete and humanized rehabilitation.
Keywords: Mastectomy; Plastic Reconstruction; Plastic Surgery; Oncology.
15 State University of Feira de Santana
105
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 05 - n 01 - ano 2025
INTRODUCTION
Mastectomy, although often essential for the treatment of breast cancer, represents a
challenging milestone in the lives of patients, signicantly impacting self-image, self-esteem, and
quality of life. Breast loss transcends physical aspects, affecting psychological and social dimensions,
making breast reconstruction a crucial step for many women. This procedure is not just a surgical
intervention; it is an opportunity to rescue the identity and emotional well-being of patients (Rocha
et al., 2021).
Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction has evolved considerably, driven by advances in
surgical techniques and the development of new materials. Approaches such as the use of autologous
aps and breast implants offer personalized options, considering factors such as type of cancer, stage
of disease, and patient preferences. In addition, the combination with treatments such as radiotherapy
and chemotherapy requires multidisciplinary planning, ensuring better aesthetic and functional
outcomes (Fisher et al., 2020).
Another central point in breast reconstruction is the role it plays in the psychological recovery
of patients. Studies show that women undergoing this surgery have lower rates of depression and
anxiety, in addition to a signicant improvement in the perception of their femininity and quality
of life. This reects the importance of integrating technical and emotional aspects into cancer care,
reinforcing breast reconstruction as an essential component in the rehabilitation process (Santoro et
al., 2019).
Finally, access to breast reconstruction still faces signicant inequalities, especially in
low- and middle-income countries. Financial barriers, lack of qualied professionals, and the stigma
associated with breast cancer limit the scope of this procedure. Thus, discussing the challenges and
advances in breast reconstruction is essential to expand access and promote a holistic approach to
patient care (González et al., 2022).
The aim of this study is to explore the advances and benets of post-mastectomy breast
106
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 05 - n 01 - ano 2025
reconstruction, addressing its psychological implications, available techniques, and the challenges
faced by patients in the rehabilitation process
MATERIALS AND METHODS
This literature review analyzes advances in breast reconstruction after mastectomy, focusing
on patient-centered outcomes, psychological implications, technological innovations, and challenges
in resource-limited settings. The review covers reconstruction techniques, such as the use of DIEP
aps and implants, as well as exploring barriers to access and the future prospects of the area.
Guiding Question:
What are the advances in breast reconstruction after mastectomy, considering psychosocial
outcomes, technological innovations, and access barriers?
Boolean Markers:
- “Breast Reconstruction” AND “Psychological Outcomes”
- “DIEP Flap” AND “Outcomes”
- “Breast Reconstruction” AND “Innovation”
- “Access to Reconstruction” AND “Barriers”
- “Breast Reconstruction” AND “Global Equity”
Inclusion Criteria:
Studies published between 2019 and 2023;
Peer-reviewed articles, focusing on breast reconstruction outcomes, psychological impacts,
and technical innovation;
Publications on barriers to access in underserved populations and discussions on global
107
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 05 - n 01 - ano 2025
equit y.
Exclusion Criteria:
Work outside the delimited period;
Studies that do not address psychosocial or technical outcomes, or that focus only on a single
reconstruction technique with no comparative context.
THEORETICAL FOUNDATION
Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction is not limited to restoring body aesthetics; it plays a
vital role in the patient’s overall rehabilitation. The available techniques have advanced substantially,
allowing for more personalized and less invasive approaches. Among the main options are autologous
aps, such as DIEP (Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator), and the use of breast implants, which
offer different advantages depending on the patient’s clinical prole (Chatterjee et al., 2022). These
techniques not only ensure better aesthetic results but also reduce the psychological impact associated
with mastectomy.
Autologous aps are widely considered the gold standard in breast reconstruction due to
their ability to create a natural and long-lasting result. The use of the patient’s own tissues minimizes
the risk of rejection and complications related to synthetic materials. Studies indicate that patients
undergoing the use of aps have a lower incidence of chronic pain and greater satisfaction with
aesthetic results (Garcia-Etienne et al., 2021). On the other hand, breast implants remain a viable
option for women who do not have enough tissue for aps or prefer a faster recovery (Hidalgo et al.,
2023).
Another signicant advance in the area is the incorporation of 3D technologies in surgical
planning. 3D printing and virtual modeling have transformed breast reconstruction, allowing surgeons
to simulate procedures and adjust details with high precision before surgery. This advancement not
108
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 05 - n 01 - ano 2025
only improves aesthetic outcomes but also reduces complications and operative time, optimizing the
patient experience (Ho et al., 2021).
In addition, the emotional impact of breast reconstruction is a fundamental dimension of
care. Studies show that reconstruction promotes the recovery of self-image, reduction of depressive
symptoms, and increased patient condence. Attention to psychological well-being during the
treatment process is essential for a positive outcome, which reinforces the importance of psychosocial
support as an integral part of multidisciplinary care (Rowland et al., 2020).
On the other hand, challenges still exist in expanding access to breast reconstruction, especially
in public health systems and in low-income regions. Economic barriers, lack of infrastructure, and
inequalities in access to trained professionals limit the performance of this procedure. Solutions, such
as training programs for surgeons and subsidies for breast reconstructions in vulnerable populations,
have been proposed to address these difculties (Figueiredo et al., 2022).
As a result, breast reconstruction is inserted in a context of continuous innovation and
expansion of access. The recognition of its relevance goes beyond aesthetics, integrating the concept
of integral health. Progress in techniques and the incorporation of technological approaches indicate
a promising future, but there is still a long way to go to ensure that all women, regardless of their
location or socioeconomic status, have access to this transformative procedure (Smit et al., 2023).
CONCLUSION
It is then concluded that post-mastectomy breast reconstruction transcends the aesthetic
aspect, consolidating itself as an essential procedure in the physical and emotional recovery of
patients. This intervention provides not only the restoration of anatomy, but also a rescue of self-
esteem, positively impacting the quality of life and psychological coping with breast cancer.
Technical advances, such as the use of autologous aps and the development of technologies
such as 3D printing, demonstrate signicant progress in the personalization and effectiveness
109
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 05 - n 01 - ano 2025
of procedures. However, access limitations, especially in low-income contexts, still pose critical
challenges. Innovative approaches, combined with public policies that promote equity in access to
health, are essential to ensure that all women can benet from these innovations.
In addition, the integration of multidisciplinary teams, involving surgeons, psychologists
and social workers, reafrms the need for a holistic approach to patient care. This integrative view
is essential to meet the physical and emotional demands imposed by mastectomy, promoting more
satisfactory outcomes that are aligned with women’s expectations.
Thus, the future scenario of breast reconstruction points to an increase in the accessibility
and efciency of procedures, based on the development of new technologies and global awareness of
the importance of this care. Despite advances, the commitment to overcoming economic and social
barriers remains crucial to achieving truly inclusive and transformative care.
REFERENCES
Fisher, C. M., et al. (2020). Advances in breast reconstruction: A focus on patient-centered outcomes.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 146(5), 919-928.
Rocha, A. P., et al. (2021). Psychological outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A
systematic review. Psycho-Oncology, 30(3), 299-308.
Santoro, L., et al. (2019). Emotional well-being and quality of life in patients undergoing breast
reconstruction. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 37(15), 1289-1295.
González, A. R., et al. (2022). Challenges in providing breast reconstruction in low-resource settings.
The Lancet Oncology, 23(7), e297-e305.
Chatterjee, A., et al. (2022). Advances in breast reconstruction techniques: Trends and future
directions. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open, 10(5), e4563.
Garcia-Etienne, C. A., et al. (2021). Outcomes of DIEP ap breast reconstruction: A systematic review.
Annals of Surgical Oncology, 28(4), 2234-2241.
110
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 05 - n 01 - ano 2025
Hidalgo, D. A., et al. (2023). The evolving role of implants in breast reconstruction. Current Opinion
in Plastic Surgery, 30(2), 156-162.
Ho, A., et al. (2021). Application of 3D technologies in breast reconstruction: Innovations and clinical
outcomes. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 124(7), 1125-1133.
Rowland, J. H., et al. (2020). Psychosocial outcomes after breast reconstruction: An integrative review.
Psycho-Oncology, 29(9), 1383-1391.
Figueiredo, N. M., et al. (2022). Addressing barriers to breast reconstruction in underserved
populations: A call for action. The Lancet Global Health, 10(6), e844-e850.
Smit, J. M., et al. (2023). Future perspectives in breast reconstruction: Patient-centered care and global
equity. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 151(3), 579-587.
