data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8c18/e8c184800026c07d12f3789d259e55c70f9b1a4c" alt=""
91
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 05 - n 01 - ano 2025
cases. This number is also among the highest in Brazil, which may be related to the population density
and the state epidemiological context, including the quality of health services and the population’s
awareness of symptoms and diagnoses. Minas Gerais has a wide network of health units and public
health initiatives, which may have led to the detection and notication of a signicant number of cases.
Next, the state of Rio de Janeiro (33) also draws attention, with 6,121 conrmed cases. Rio de
Janeiro, being one of the most populous states with a robust health infrastructure, has high incidence
numbers, reecting both the effectiveness of the health network and the possibility of underreporting
in other states with fewer resources. The variability in state data suggests that regional disparities
directly inuence detection rates.
At the other end of the table, states such as Roraima (14) and Amapá (16) have signicantly
lower numbers, with only 459 and 165 conrmed cases, respectively. These states have smaller
populations and a health network that, although present, may not be as efcient in terms of detection
compared to large capitals. In addition, the socioeconomic particularities of regions farther from the
center of the country also inuence these numbers.
Another relevant data is the large number of unconrmed cases, especially in states such
as Bahia (29), which has 8,407 unconrmed cases, which may indicate a failure in data collection
or analysis, or even a resistance of the population to seek care for diagnosis. This phenomenon of
underreporting may be common in areas with less access to health care or in more vulnerable regions,
reecting inequalities in health care.
The analysis of blank and ignored data shows the importance of a continuous process of
reviewing health records. The signicant number of blank (10,775) and ignored (3,053) cases in several
states indicates that there is a lack of consistency in the completion of data, which can hinder the
accuracy of statistics and make it difcult to develop more effective public health strategies. Facing
this challenge requires improvements in the processes of collecting and systematizing information.
This information reveals an alarming picture, with a signicant concentration of cases in
states such as São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro and Minas Gerais. This phenomenon can be interpreted from