53
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 05 - n 01 - ano 2025
increasingly, the pedagogical objective has been guided by the evaluation of competencies. Some of
the changes are consequences of the growing complexity of scientic knowledge and the improvement
of technological means (FEITOSA et al., 2021)element. However, it is still a challenge to determine
which tool is the best for the study of neuroanatomy, considering the diversity of knowledge of the
students (ARANTES; FERREIRA, 2016).
Some strategies can be used to contribute to the identication of anatomical structures,
in addition to synthetic and cadaveric specimens (SANDERS et al., 2019). The study of human
neuroanatomy through the use of cadavers is relevant as it oers a deeper understanding of the
topography of the body, allowing students to analyze the anatomical relationships between distinct
organs and structures (PROHMANN et al., 2023)element.
However, the manipulation of the corpse by students is a practice that presents some obstacles,
in most educational institutions, the cadaveric bodies are of people who died and were not sought
by friends or family members who, according to Law No. 8,501 (BRASIL, 1992), can be used for
teaching and research.
However, it is possible to notice a reduction in the availability of unclaimed bodies today.
This is related to recent progress in the country’s socioeconomic conditions, along with costly
bureaucratic procedures for the regularization of unclaimed bodies (CURY; CENSONI; AMBRÓSIO,
2013; PROHMANN et al., 2023).
Thus, in recent years, as technology advances, diverse and varied teaching approaches have
emerged to meet the need to use the cadaver as an educational resource. We can cite as examples
the use of digital whiteboards, videos, 3D software, synthetic anatomical models and many other
innovative methods (OLIVEIRA et al., 2020; SOUSA et al., 2023)element.
In October 2017, the Ministry of Education and Culture (MEC), through the General
Coordination for the Evaluation of Undergraduate Courses of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs)
presented new instruments for the evaluation of undergraduate courses where It includes innovation,
which it called “successful practices or innovations” (CASTRO, 2011; DAVID; OLIVE TREE;