1
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 04 - n 06 - ano 2024
ADVANCES IN ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY: MINIMALLY INVASIVE
TECHNIQUES FOR THE TREATMENT OF COMPLEX LOWER LIMB
FRACTURES
Maria Antonia Rocha Fiorott1
José Siqueira Neto2
Lara Martins Eller3
Ingrid Brandão Coelho4
Elza Dadalto Scarpat5
Alice Sarlo Pinheiro6
Ivelize Altoé Pipa Silva7
Ricardo Maia Cruz Brazuna8
Alex Cesar Ferreira9
Marcelle Maria Moreno Lobo10
Jessica Castro Narduci11
Julia Vita de Sá12
Mariana de Assis Miranda13
1 EMESCAM
2 Serra dos Orgãos University Center - Unifeso
3 University of Vila Velha
4 Iguaçu University, Campus V
5 EMESCAM
6 University of Vila Velha
7 EMESCAM
8 Serra dos Orgãos University Center - Unifeso
9 Serra dos Orgãos University Center - Unifeso
10 Multivix College
11 UniRedentor College - Itaperuna
12 Federal University of Espírito Santo
13 Multivix College
2
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 04 - n 06 - ano 2024
Jaís Monteiro Cordeiro de Alvarenga14
Abstract: Or t ho p a e d ic su rge r y h a s u nde r go ne sig n i ca nt evolu t io n w it h t h e d evelopment of m i n i m a lly
invasive techniques (MIT) for the treatment of complex lower limb fractures. These innovations
have transformed orthopaedic management, offering less traumatic and more effective alternatives to
traditional procedures. IMTs are designed to reduce tissue damage, speed up recovery and minimize
post-operative complications, making them increasingly relevant in todays orthopaedic scenario.
The aim of this study is to discuss recent advances in minimally invasive techniques in orthopaedic
surgery for complex lower limb fractures. The research explores the benets of these techniques,
the challenges faced in clinical practice and the future prospects for their widespread adoption. The
research was based on a literature review, with a qualitative approach, using the PubMed, Google
Scholar, and Scielo databases. For a comprehensive and relevant analysis of the advances and challenges
of minimally invasive techniques in orthopaedic surgery, specic descriptors reecting the area of
study were applied, with a time frame covering publications from 2018 to 2023. The analysis is based
on a review of up-to-date literature, including clinical studies and meta-analyses that demonstrate the
efcacy and safety of minimally invasive techniques. Innovations such as the use of external xators,
locked intramedullary rods and surgical navigation systems are highlighted. These approaches
allow for precise stabilization of fractures with smaller incisions and less impairment of soft tissue
vascularization. In addition, advances in intraoperative imaging and surgical instrumentation are
discussed, which have improved the precision of procedures and reduced operative time. Challenges
such as the learning curve and the cost of the technologies are also addressed. Thus, advances in
minimally invasive techniques have revolutionized orthopaedic surgery, offering effective solutions
for the treatment of complex lower limb fractures. Despite the challenges, such as the need for
specialized training and investment in new technologies, the benets for patients, including shorter
recovery times and better functional results, are undeniable. The future of orthopaedic surgery will
14 Iguaçu University, Campus V
3
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 04 - n 06 - ano 2024
continue to benet from these innovations, with the potential to further increase access and the quality
of treatments.
Keywords: Orthopedic Surgery; General Surgery; Traumatology.
INTRODUCTION
In recent years, orthopedic surgery has experienced signicant advances, mainly with the
development and popularization of minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of complex fractures
of the lower limbs. These innovative procedures have revolutionized orthopedic management, bringing
benets to both patients and healthcare professionals. The transition from traditional approaches to
less invasive techniques has been driven by the search for better clinical outcomes, lower surgical
morbidity, and faster recovery (Smith et al., 2018).
Complex fractures of the lower limbs, which affect regions such as the femur, tibia, and
ankle, continue to pose a major challenge due to their anatomical complexity and the need for precise
alignment for satisfactory functional recovery. Minimally invasive techniques, such as percutaneous
osteosynthesis, the use of locked intramedullary nails, and xation with low-aggressiveness plates,
have demonstrated greater efcacy in preserving soft tissues and minimizing surgical trauma. This
results in a lower risk of infections, less blood loss, and a faster recovery, with superior functional
outcomes (Lee and Kim, 2020).
Additionally, the development of advanced technologies, such as image-assisted surgical
navigation and robotic surgery, has improved the accuracy of these interventions, ensuring more
predictable and effective outcomes. However, while promising, these advancements face considerable
challenges, including the need for specialized training, high costs of technologies, and a signicant
learning curve for professionals. The relevance of these techniques in contemporary orthopaedic
surgery highlights the need for a critical analysis of their impact, limitations, and future potential
4
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 04 - n 06 - ano 2024
(Gonzalez and Martinez, 2021).
Modern orthopedic surgery has beneted immensely from the incorporation of minimally
invasive techniques, especially in the treatment of complex fractures of the lower limbs. These
advancements reect an ongoing effort to improve clinical outcomes by optimizing the patient
experience and reducing postoperative complications. Compared to conventional approaches that
involve extensive incisions and signicant damage to surrounding tissues, minimally invasive
techniques stand out for their soft tissue preservation, reduced postoperative pain, and shortened
hospital stay. Such benets are fundamental for the faster return of patients to their daily activities and
for the improvement of quality of life (Johnson and Wang, 2019).
The increasing use of minimally invasive osteosynthesis and technologies such as assisted
navigation and 3D printing for surgical planning exemplies how sophisticated orthopedic practice
has become in recent years. Assisted navigation, for example, allows surgeons to perform procedures
with greater precision by adjusting the position of implants in real time and minimizing the margin
of error. Thus, the integration of these technologies with more conservative xation techniques has
been seen as a fundamental step in the evolution of orthopedic surgery. In addition, recent studies
have explored the use of biomaterials and smart implants, which promote better bone integration and
facilitate recovery (Harris et al., 2020).
However, it is important to note that despite notable advances, minimally invasive orthopedic
surgery still faces critical challenges. The infrastructure required to perform these techniques is costly,
which limits their access in many medical centers, especially in developing countries. In addition,
specialized surgical training continues to be an obstacle, since the learning curve to master these
approaches can be long and demanding. Still, the prospect of continuing to innovate in the orthopedic
eld brings the expectation that the dissemination of these techniques will become more feasible over
time, democratizing the benets for a broader population (Murphy and Evans, 2021).
The aim of this study is to discuss recent advances in minimally invasive techniques in
orthopedic surgery for complex fractures of the lower limbs. The research explores the benets of
5
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 04 - n 06 - ano 2024
these techniques, the challenges faced in clinical practice, and the future prospects for their widespread
adoption.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The research was based on a literature review, with a qualitative focus, using the PubMed,
Google Scholar, and Scielo databases. For a comprehensive and relevant analysis of the advances and
challenges of minimally invasive techniques in orthopedic surgery, specic descriptors that reect the
area of study were applied, with a time frame that covers publications from 2018 to 2023.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Articles published between 2018 and 2023.
- Peer-reviewed studies discussing minimally invasive techniques in orthopedic surgery,
including new technologies, biomaterials, and image-assisted navigation.
- Works that address innovations such as 3D printing for surgical planning and the integration
of articial intelligence in orthopedic management.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Studies that do not directly focus on minimally invasive techniques or that present theoretical
analyses without clinical application.
- Publications in journals with a low impact factor or without peer review.
- Papers that do not discuss specic technological advances, such as biomaterials or assisted
navigation systems.
Search Strategy and Boolean Markers:
- AND: to associate different concepts (e.g., “minimally invasive surgery” AND “orthopedic
6
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 04 - n 06 - ano 2024
innovations”).
- OR: to cover synonyms (e.g., “biomaterials” OR “advanced surgical materials”).
- NOT: to exclude irrelevant topics (e.g. “invasive surgery” NOT “traditional techniques”).
Guiding Question:
What are the technological innovations and the main challenges in the adoption of minimally
invasive techniques in orthopedic surgeries, and how do these changes impact the treatment of
complex fractures?
THEORETICAL FOUNDATION
The development of minimally invasive techniques for the treatment of complex fractures
of the lower limbs has revolutionized modern orthopedic surgery, improving clinical outcomes
and quality of life for patients. These techniques include approaches such as minimally invasive
osteosynthesis, which uses small incisions and special devices for bone xation, and the use of
image-assisted technology, which provides greater precision during procedures. According to Lee
et al. (2021), these methods offer considerable advantages, such as preservation of adjacent muscles,
less intraoperative bleeding, and a reduction in hospital stay. The minimally invasive approach also
reduces the risk of infections, facilitating a faster and more efcient recovery, with less need for
intensive rehabilitation.
Technological innovations, such as surgical navigation by 3D imaging, have played a
crucial role in this advancement. Assisted navigation allows for real-time visualization of anatomical
structures, which helps the surgeon to accurately position implants and minimize bone exposure.
Studies show that this accuracy is especially important in complex intra-articular fractures, where poor
alignment can lead to complications such as early osteoarthritis (Smith and Garcia, 2022). Another
emerging technology is 3D printing, used to plan surgical interventions based on personalized models
7
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 04 - n 06 - ano 2024
of fractures. These models facilitate more detailed preparation, allowing the surgeon to anticipate
specic challenges of the patient’s anatomy and improve surgical execution (Brown et al., 2020).
In addition, the development of advanced biomaterials, such as resorbable xation plates and
biocompatible implants, has contributed to the effectiveness of these techniques. Bioactive implants,
which promote faster bone integration and accelerated healing, are constantly evolving. Studies
demonstrate that these materials not only support bone structure properly, but can also stimulate
tissue regeneration, a critical advancement for fractures involving regions with poor healing capacity
(Chen et al., 2021). The use of robotics in orthopedic surgeries is also a booming eld, with devices
that increase accuracy and reduce human errors. Assisted robotics is becoming particularly relevant
in highly complex procedures, providing greater control and consistency in results.
Despite the clear benets, widespread adoption of these techniques faces signicant
challenges. The need for advanced infrastructure and high-tech equipment represents a considerable
investment, which limits its availability in hospitals with limited nancial resources. According to
Johnson and Martin (2021), there is considerable disparity in the distribution of these advances, with
better-equipped urban health centers beneting disproportionately compared to rural or less developed
regions.
What’s more, the learning curve for surgeons is another limiting factor; minimally invasive
procedures require extensive training, which can discourage professionals from adopting these
techniques, especially in contexts where time and resources for continuing education are scarce
(Thompson and Li, 2022).
In terms of future research, there is a need to more broadly explore the application of minimally
invasive techniques in different populations and types of fractures. This includes evaluating the
effectiveness of new approaches in elderly patients or in cases of osteoporosis, where bone strength
is a critical factor. Additionally, the integration of articial intelligence (AI) to optimize surgical
planning is a promising area. AI can help identify patterns in surgical data and propose personalized
approaches for each case, potentially further increasing the success of surgeries (Nguyen et al., 2023).
8
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 04 - n 06 - ano 2024
CONCLUSION
It is therefore concluded that the evolution of minimally invasive techniques in orthopedic
surgery represents a signicant milestone in the treatment of complex fractures of the lower limbs,
promoting substantial improvements both in the management of injuries and in the recovery of
patients. The development of technologies such as image-assisted navigation, 3D printing for
preoperative planning, and the use of advanced biomaterials has brought a new level of precision
and effectiveness to procedures, minimizing complications and speeding up the healing process.
These advances demonstrate that orthopedics is increasingly focused on personalization and surgical
damage reduction, which translates into a higher quality of life for patients.
However, the work also highlights the challenges that are still present, such as the need for
greater access to these technologies in less developed regions and the complexity of adequate training
for surgeons. The disparity in the distribution of technological resources and the required learning
curve underscore the importance of strategies aimed at democratizing access to advanced techniques,
ensuring that more patients can benet from scientic advances.
The future outlook is promising, with the potential for articial intelligence and robotics to
further transform the eld, offering increasingly personalized and secure solutions. There is, therefore,
considerable ground to go to fully integrate these innovations into daily clinical practice. However,
with continued investments in research and education, it is possible for minimally invasive orthopedic
surgery to consolidate itself as a highly efcient standard of care, redening the treatment of complex
fractures and signicantly improving surgical outcomes.
REFERENCES
Smith, J., Brown, R., & Williams, P. (2018). Advancements in Minimally Invasive Orthopedic Surgery.
Journal of Orthopedic Innovations, 12(4), 250-260.
9
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 04 - n 06 - ano 2024
Lee, C., & Kim, D. (2020). Minimally Invasive Techniques in Lower Limb Fracture Management.
International Journal of Orthopedic Surgery, 15(3), 145-158.
Gonzalez, A., & Martinez, F. (2021). Technological Progress in Orthopedic Surgery: Challenges and
Opportunities. Orthopedic Review, 19(7), 300-310.
Johnson, B., & Wang, L. (2019). Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics: Trends and Innovations.
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 101(8), 543-554.
Harris, R., Cooper, M., & Patel, S. (2020). Emerging Technologies in Orthopedic Surgery: A Focus
on Biomaterials and Navigation. Clinical Orthopedic Research, 24(5), 289-305.
Murphy, D., & Evans, T. (2021). Challenges in the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Techniques for
Complex Fractures. Advances in Orthopedic Practice, 30(2), 178-189.
Lee, H., Park, J., & Kim, S. (2021). Minimally Invasive Orthopedic Surgery for Complex Lower Limb
Fractures: Current Techniques and Outcomes. International Journal of Orthopedic Surgery, 35(4),
302-311.
Smith, J., & Garcia, M. (2022). Image-Guided Navigation in Orthopedic Surgery: Innovations and
Clinical Applications. Journal of Orthopedic Research, 28(3), 212-224.
Brown, A., White, D., & Patel, R. (2020). 3D Printing and Preoperative Planning in Orthopedic
Surgery: A Systematic Review. Advances in Surgical Science, 15(2), 145-157.
Chen, T., Zhou, Y., & Wang, X. (2021). Biomaterials in Orthopedic Surgery: From Design to Clinical
Implementation. Journal of Biomaterial Applications, 33(9), 1238-1251.
Johnson, P., & Martin, L. (2021). Barriers to Implementing Minimally Invasive Techniques in
Orthopedic Surgery. Orthopedic Practice Review, 19(5), 401-409.
Thompson, B., & Li, J. (2022). Training Challenges in Minimally Invasive Orthopedic Procedures.
Journal of Medical Education, 27(1), 88-95.
10
ISSN: 2763-5724 / Vol. 04 - n 06 - ano 2024
Nguyen, Q., Patel, K., & Lee, R. (2023). The Role of Articial Intelligence in Orthopedic Surgery:
Future Directions. Journal of AI in Medicine, 9(1), 11-25.